<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cops: Jonathon Edington&#8217;s Neighbor Did NOT Molest Daughter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/</link>
	<description>Parenting so bad it&#039;s criminal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: suki</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>suki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>So, you kill the abuser-how does that help your
child-you go to jail and now she&#039;s lost you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you kill the abuser-how does that help your<br />
child-you go to jail and now she&#8217;s lost you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Christine is a bit of a drama queen, now she has &quot;multiple sclerosis&quot; and isn&#039;t able to work.  Boo fricken Hoo accomplice

Those two children should be taken off her since she obviously has a mental problem involving attention seeking (Munchausen perhaps).

The complaint of child molestation was filed after her husband had already killed the guy, so it was probably a story they made up after they killed him for being guilty of living.  Mr Edinton being a lawyer no doubt thought he&#039;d get no time in  jail at all after using the insanity defence and claims of abuse (to add sympathy).

Note to all the hubbies out there, killing your neighbour will not stop your wife being crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Christine is a bit of a drama queen, now she has &#8220;multiple sclerosis&#8221; and isn&#8217;t able to work.  Boo fricken Hoo accomplice</p>
<p>Those two children should be taken off her since she obviously has a mental problem involving attention seeking (Munchausen perhaps).</p>
<p>The complaint of child molestation was filed after her husband had already killed the guy, so it was probably a story they made up after they killed him for being guilty of living.  Mr Edinton being a lawyer no doubt thought he&#8217;d get no time in  jail at all after using the insanity defence and claims of abuse (to add sympathy).</p>
<p>Note to all the hubbies out there, killing your neighbour will not stop your wife being crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>How did he (a disabled obese man) climb in the window?

This is the description of the abuse I have read:

The girl “explained that she did not want to go home because of Barry,” police said in the report. When her mother asked her to explain, the girl said “that Barry puts it on her belly and her nose,” the report said. When her mother asked her when James does this, she replied, “He comes to me in the starry nights.” //end quote

Sounds like Mum took a few poetic liberties with her description there.  Was the child&#039;s mother abused when she was little?  The mother is the one who jumped the ball here and the husband ran right along behind her.  If my child said something like that I&#039;d be at the police station (and impressed with their language skills).  I wouldn&#039;t be calling my husband on the phone telling him to go kill the neighbour for putting &quot;it&quot; (what is &quot;it&quot;?) on my child&#039;s nose and belly (in &quot;the starry nights&quot; even).  How does anyone know she didn&#039;t tell her husband to go next door and do the deed?

You people who say &quot;the child described the molestation&quot; should actually read the described molestation and wonder how a 2 yr old came up with that.  Also wonder how a man who had trouble climbing stairs climbed in a window in the dark and found a child in the dark room without making a noise.  The innocent man is dead killed by a guilty murdering robot who jumped when his wife said to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did he (a disabled obese man) climb in the window?</p>
<p>This is the description of the abuse I have read:</p>
<p>The girl “explained that she did not want to go home because of Barry,” police said in the report. When her mother asked her to explain, the girl said “that Barry puts it on her belly and her nose,” the report said. When her mother asked her when James does this, she replied, “He comes to me in the starry nights.” //end quote</p>
<p>Sounds like Mum took a few poetic liberties with her description there.  Was the child&#8217;s mother abused when she was little?  The mother is the one who jumped the ball here and the husband ran right along behind her.  If my child said something like that I&#8217;d be at the police station (and impressed with their language skills).  I wouldn&#8217;t be calling my husband on the phone telling him to go kill the neighbour for putting &#8220;it&#8221; (what is &#8220;it&#8221;?) on my child&#8217;s nose and belly (in &#8220;the starry nights&#8221; even).  How does anyone know she didn&#8217;t tell her husband to go next door and do the deed?</p>
<p>You people who say &#8220;the child described the molestation&#8221; should actually read the described molestation and wonder how a 2 yr old came up with that.  Also wonder how a man who had trouble climbing stairs climbed in a window in the dark and found a child in the dark room without making a noise.  The innocent man is dead killed by a guilty murdering robot who jumped when his wife said to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>Ashley;

Apples and oranges.

Yes, her statement are perhaps true and given to her mother.

And, yes, the baby, the 2year old, may have had this happen, BUT

AND I SAY BUT, ...!!!!, WE, need to find the real criminal if it really happened.  We must prevent further molestions.

Me, as well as the State, could never logically figure out how the MURDERED victum could have molested this child.

I believe that James was an innocent of  circumstantual evidence.

But, again, John killed.  He never let James prove innocence.  And, maybe, the real person who access to this baby is still loose.

I ask that you stop and look at the evidence.  And again, from day one, I never figured out logically how a hated neighbor by the Edingtons could ever get this close to their child.

In in Florida, the neighbor stole  the child.  Immediate evidence.

But again, in this case, we are to believe that nothing in the baby&#039;s room ever gave the parents an ideal of molestion until she babbled.

I never denied the baby&#039;s words.  For me, I could never LOGICALLY place James there without being caught.

I&#039;m a father and never let my BOYS out of hearing distance until, well, even they were 14-teen and 10.

But, again and most importantly, we need to stop fighting and determine if a the crime was committed.  And, the find the criminal.

We, most importantly, need to protect our children.  But, we can&#039;t burn witches without tangentable reason.  Killing the innocent IS WRONG.

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley;</p>
<p>Apples and oranges.</p>
<p>Yes, her statement are perhaps true and given to her mother.</p>
<p>And, yes, the baby, the 2year old, may have had this happen, BUT</p>
<p>AND I SAY BUT, &#8230;!!!!, WE, need to find the real criminal if it really happened.  We must prevent further molestions.</p>
<p>Me, as well as the State, could never logically figure out how the MURDERED victum could have molested this child.</p>
<p>I believe that James was an innocent of  circumstantual evidence.</p>
<p>But, again, John killed.  He never let James prove innocence.  And, maybe, the real person who access to this baby is still loose.</p>
<p>I ask that you stop and look at the evidence.  And again, from day one, I never figured out logically how a hated neighbor by the Edingtons could ever get this close to their child.</p>
<p>In in Florida, the neighbor stole  the child.  Immediate evidence.</p>
<p>But again, in this case, we are to believe that nothing in the baby&#8217;s room ever gave the parents an ideal of molestion until she babbled.</p>
<p>I never denied the baby&#8217;s words.  For me, I could never LOGICALLY place James there without being caught.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a father and never let my BOYS out of hearing distance until, well, even they were 14-teen and 10.</p>
<p>But, again and most importantly, we need to stop fighting and determine if a the crime was committed.  And, the find the criminal.</p>
<p>We, most importantly, need to protect our children.  But, we can&#8217;t burn witches without tangentable reason.  Killing the innocent IS WRONG.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3276</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3276</guid>
		<description>how do they know he&#039;s innocent? just because he didnt have child porn? that doesn&#039;t make sense ! maybe the man had molested before and was never caught. if my daughter said something like that i would go off too. the words she used werent words a normal 2 year old knows. so why would she use those words and say that he molested her if he didnt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do they know he&#8217;s innocent? just because he didnt have child porn? that doesn&#8217;t make sense ! maybe the man had molested before and was never caught. if my daughter said something like that i would go off too. the words she used werent words a normal 2 year old knows. so why would she use those words and say that he molested her if he didnt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>&quot;A red door painted black.&quot;

No winners.  No winners.  Sadness for all.  Jonathon you acted.  Barry, you suffered so very much pain, I still cry for you.  Edington family, I wish that we can change that one day again.  James family, I commit to you that for every Mass I attend for the rest of my life, I will think and pray for Barry.

Why, oh Lord, why did this have to happen?  Free will, I guess.

Solutions and reconsilations?  I have none.

Except, love always.  Never hate.  Truly give and ask yourself, Lord, given one chance, did I save and Help the world.

Religion is a personal thing.  I don&#039;t care what you think.  In fact, I don&#039;t need to convert you, either.

Myself, I ask, was I given a chance to better the world and did I do it?

Again, I ask everyone to pray for the James family.  I also, more importantly, ask that you support the Edingtons&#039; as well.

Trully, I believe that THS IS a time to do this for both.  Don&#039;t ever HATE, either.  Love always.

Again, Jonathon acted in what he thought was in the best safety for his daughter.  I always contended that his belief was that of the Twlight Zone.

But, again, more importantly, love both families.  Report possible molestors to the Law and fore and first most, protect our children our babies always.  And, always error on their safety without breaking the law.  My, no, our,  babies&#039; safety 1st always!!!!!

Take care!
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A red door painted black.&#8221;</p>
<p>No winners.  No winners.  Sadness for all.  Jonathon you acted.  Barry, you suffered so very much pain, I still cry for you.  Edington family, I wish that we can change that one day again.  James family, I commit to you that for every Mass I attend for the rest of my life, I will think and pray for Barry.</p>
<p>Why, oh Lord, why did this have to happen?  Free will, I guess.</p>
<p>Solutions and reconsilations?  I have none.</p>
<p>Except, love always.  Never hate.  Truly give and ask yourself, Lord, given one chance, did I save and Help the world.</p>
<p>Religion is a personal thing.  I don&#8217;t care what you think.  In fact, I don&#8217;t need to convert you, either.</p>
<p>Myself, I ask, was I given a chance to better the world and did I do it?</p>
<p>Again, I ask everyone to pray for the James family.  I also, more importantly, ask that you support the Edingtons&#8217; as well.</p>
<p>Trully, I believe that THS IS a time to do this for both.  Don&#8217;t ever HATE, either.  Love always.</p>
<p>Again, Jonathon acted in what he thought was in the best safety for his daughter.  I always contended that his belief was that of the Twlight Zone.</p>
<p>But, again, more importantly, love both families.  Report possible molestors to the Law and fore and first most, protect our children our babies always.  And, always error on their safety without breaking the law.  My, no, our,  babies&#8217; safety 1st always!!!!!</p>
<p>Take care!<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaycey</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaycey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>http://www.connpost.com/ci_6173352?source=most_emailed

Though civil action is apparently still pending from James&#039; family, it appears the criminal proceedings have now been concluded, with Edington pleading guilty down to 1st degree manslaughter.

The 911 phone calls are at the above article URL I listed.  I listened to the Edington one, but couldn&#039;t bring myself to listen to the one from James&#039; parents.  The article described the content alright, and it sounded heartbreaking enough to me to keep me away from the actual audio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.connpost.com/ci_6173352?source=most_emailed" rel="nofollow">http://www.connpost.com/ci_6173352?source=most_emailed</a></p>
<p>Though civil action is apparently still pending from James&#8217; family, it appears the criminal proceedings have now been concluded, with Edington pleading guilty down to 1st degree manslaughter.</p>
<p>The 911 phone calls are at the above article URL I listed.  I listened to the Edington one, but couldn&#8217;t bring myself to listen to the one from James&#8217; parents.  The article described the content alright, and it sounded heartbreaking enough to me to keep me away from the actual audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>Both Benedict and Fairfield police have said they found no evidence that James had molested the Edingtons&#039; daughter. They also said Christina Edington has refused to cooperate with the investigation into the slaying.

Same article from ConnPost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Benedict and Fairfield police have said they found no evidence that James had molested the Edingtons&#8217; daughter. They also said Christina Edington has refused to cooperate with the investigation into the slaying.</p>
<p>Same article from ConnPost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>http://www.connpost.com/localnews/ci_5796733

Fairfield lawyer Jonathan Edington, who police say stabbed his neighbor to death last year after his wife told him the neighbor had molested their 2-year-old daughter, plans an insanity defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.connpost.com/localnews/ci_5796733" rel="nofollow">http://www.connpost.com/localnews/ci_5796733</a></p>
<p>Fairfield lawyer Jonathan Edington, who police say stabbed his neighbor to death last year after his wife told him the neighbor had molested their 2-year-old daughter, plans an insanity defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erin</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t New Haven police, it was the Fairfield Police Department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t New Haven police, it was the Fairfield Police Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cici</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>cici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>why did the little girl say he did that if he didnt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why did the little girl say he did that if he didnt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Concerned &amp; Jaycey

&quot;Your claim that because child molesters are incurable that their deaths should be regarded as a positive is truly troubling indeed.&quot;

Jaycey, I agree with you on this one.

Concerned, I think you need to take a minute and revisit what we know.

1st - James is dead.  He can not be interviewed or questioned and can not admit guilt.  Dead, you know.

2nd - Jonathon killed.  I like the one message about it be personal.  That is, most persons choose guns to distance himself or herself from the murder.  Up close and personal.  Very violent.

3rd - The police found no physical evidence.

4rd - Adults trying to interupt a 2 year old&#039;s babbling.

5th - Explain again how James committed this crime.

For the love of pete, what is it about this case that people can&#039;t think straight.

Yes there are molestors.  Yes they need to be caught and prosecuted.  But what is it about this case that people still believe that the murder of James was justified?

Okay let&#039;s go abstract.  So, if I&#039;m driving using a GPS device and it tells me to turn left, and I turn left into someone&#039;s front yard and run over the 2 year old baby, then it&#039;s the baby&#039;s fault because GPS don&#039;t lie and I unquestionaly believed and didn&#039;t take it upon myself to look ahead and verify and predict that my actions may be wrong.  I was full of road rage the entire time I was driving and did not look or care about the impact into the child&#039;s family.  But again, GPS don&#039;t lie, so I must go free.

Bad example, I know.  But reading these message, you guys with you lynching mentality to a man knived 13 times to death already really scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned &amp; Jaycey</p>
<p>&#8220;Your claim that because child molesters are incurable that their deaths should be regarded as a positive is truly troubling indeed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jaycey, I agree with you on this one.</p>
<p>Concerned, I think you need to take a minute and revisit what we know.</p>
<p>1st &#8211; James is dead.  He can not be interviewed or questioned and can not admit guilt.  Dead, you know.</p>
<p>2nd &#8211; Jonathon killed.  I like the one message about it be personal.  That is, most persons choose guns to distance himself or herself from the murder.  Up close and personal.  Very violent.</p>
<p>3rd &#8211; The police found no physical evidence.</p>
<p>4rd &#8211; Adults trying to interupt a 2 year old&#8217;s babbling.</p>
<p>5th &#8211; Explain again how James committed this crime.</p>
<p>For the love of pete, what is it about this case that people can&#8217;t think straight.</p>
<p>Yes there are molestors.  Yes they need to be caught and prosecuted.  But what is it about this case that people still believe that the murder of James was justified?</p>
<p>Okay let&#8217;s go abstract.  So, if I&#8217;m driving using a GPS device and it tells me to turn left, and I turn left into someone&#8217;s front yard and run over the 2 year old baby, then it&#8217;s the baby&#8217;s fault because GPS don&#8217;t lie and I unquestionaly believed and didn&#8217;t take it upon myself to look ahead and verify and predict that my actions may be wrong.  I was full of road rage the entire time I was driving and did not look or care about the impact into the child&#8217;s family.  But again, GPS don&#8217;t lie, so I must go free.</p>
<p>Bad example, I know.  But reading these message, you guys with you lynching mentality to a man knived 13 times to death already really scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missy</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3265</link>
		<dc:creator>missy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3265</guid>
		<description>A lawyer should know better. (DOES KNOW BETTER.)
It must be an incredibly articulate 2 year old.  The smarter they are, the more imaginative powers they have.  And if he knows the law and his possible ability to get off and to convince a jury that his extreme duress caused him to act in that manner because of his belief that a crime had been committed, he might get off altogether.  I think they had problems with the victim and conspired to rid themselves of him.  There&#039;s a sense of entitlement among rich and powerful people that makes them think they are above the law.  A lawyer would not do anything that he did not believe he could get away with.  He&#039;ll say the immediate 911 call that he made proves he &quot;got carried away&quot; but then thought better of it.  It&#039;s not like they will make the 2 year old testify.  How about having her examined prior to reacting?  And even more ironic, how about if she wasn&#039;t too clear of her identification? (my neices and nephews are older than that and often still identify well known adults by the wrong name.  I think we all look the same to them at times.)  In that case a predator could still be lurking (and laughing!)  Perhaps the child simply did not want to end a pleasant vacation and wanted to stay.  Perhaps she was already in the habit of manipulating her parents and knew they had &quot;buttons to push.&quot;  Wouldn&#039;t the first reaction be &quot;in two years time, we&#039;ve barely left that child out of our sight, how COULD this be true.&quot;  I&#039;ll bet he gets off.  I bet he does.  It is not like they will make the child testify or anything.  How rediculous is that?  I went to a private preschool and they did not teach us the word penis.  I didn&#039;t learn the word penis until kindergarten.  And even that was thought to be very precocious.  I believe his anger toward the guy started well before that phone call.   They may have even planned to do it while the wife and hchild were safely away so they wouldn&#039;t be bothered by the messy situation and uproar in the neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawyer should know better. (DOES KNOW BETTER.)<br />
It must be an incredibly articulate 2 year old.  The smarter they are, the more imaginative powers they have.  And if he knows the law and his possible ability to get off and to convince a jury that his extreme duress caused him to act in that manner because of his belief that a crime had been committed, he might get off altogether.  I think they had problems with the victim and conspired to rid themselves of him.  There&#8217;s a sense of entitlement among rich and powerful people that makes them think they are above the law.  A lawyer would not do anything that he did not believe he could get away with.  He&#8217;ll say the immediate 911 call that he made proves he &#8220;got carried away&#8221; but then thought better of it.  It&#8217;s not like they will make the 2 year old testify.  How about having her examined prior to reacting?  And even more ironic, how about if she wasn&#8217;t too clear of her identification? (my neices and nephews are older than that and often still identify well known adults by the wrong name.  I think we all look the same to them at times.)  In that case a predator could still be lurking (and laughing!)  Perhaps the child simply did not want to end a pleasant vacation and wanted to stay.  Perhaps she was already in the habit of manipulating her parents and knew they had &#8220;buttons to push.&#8221;  Wouldn&#8217;t the first reaction be &#8220;in two years time, we&#8217;ve barely left that child out of our sight, how COULD this be true.&#8221;  I&#8217;ll bet he gets off.  I bet he does.  It is not like they will make the child testify or anything.  How rediculous is that?  I went to a private preschool and they did not teach us the word penis.  I didn&#8217;t learn the word penis until kindergarten.  And even that was thought to be very precocious.  I believe his anger toward the guy started well before that phone call.   They may have even planned to do it while the wife and hchild were safely away so they wouldn&#8217;t be bothered by the messy situation and uproar in the neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaycey</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaycey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>Concerned,

Even if I agreed with your reasoning that a well-adjusted 2 year old is an unimpeachable source of truth (which I don&#039;t), your argument makes the fatal flaw of assuming that this daughter is indeed &quot;well adjusted and brought up.&quot;

Not even those here who knew the Edington and James families personally are likely qualified to make such a case with complete certainty.  One could argue that a child raised by a parent capable of such alleged violence would hardly be a candiate for normalcy.  Not that I&#039;m trying to make that case, but it serves to illustrate the point: we simply don&#039;t know.

Your claim that because child molesters are incurable that their deaths should be regarded as a positive is truly troubling indeed.  Almost universally, child molesters themselves come from a background where they have suffered sexual abuse -- will you be so firm in your convictions if Edington&#039;s daughter should herself become an abuser later in life?  Would you also be willing to deny her the right to a trial to face allegations against her, and strike her down on the word of one person, absent any other evidence?

How easy it must be for you to judge, what knowing all the facts of every situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned,</p>
<p>Even if I agreed with your reasoning that a well-adjusted 2 year old is an unimpeachable source of truth (which I don&#8217;t), your argument makes the fatal flaw of assuming that this daughter is indeed &#8220;well adjusted and brought up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not even those here who knew the Edington and James families personally are likely qualified to make such a case with complete certainty.  One could argue that a child raised by a parent capable of such alleged violence would hardly be a candiate for normalcy.  Not that I&#8217;m trying to make that case, but it serves to illustrate the point: we simply don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Your claim that because child molesters are incurable that their deaths should be regarded as a positive is truly troubling indeed.  Almost universally, child molesters themselves come from a background where they have suffered sexual abuse &#8212; will you be so firm in your convictions if Edington&#8217;s daughter should herself become an abuser later in life?  Would you also be willing to deny her the right to a trial to face allegations against her, and strike her down on the word of one person, absent any other evidence?</p>
<p>How easy it must be for you to judge, what knowing all the facts of every situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned</title>
		<link>http://badbreeders.net/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsbehavingbadly.com/2006/10/19/cops-jonathan-edingtons-neighbor-did-not-molest-daughter/#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>IMO, 2 year olds do not make things up.
At that age they are pretty much like the proverbial
parrot, in that they repeat virtually everything said to them (or in this case, done to them).

I find it impossible to believe that a 2 yr old well adjusted and brought up child would say anything like this if there was not a single grain of truth to it.

I believe 100% that the father was justified and the neighbour was Guilty.

And as Child molesters are incurable, then the death of this one was the best thing that could have happened.

Better that the father be in prison and and the child alive, than the molester get a second chance and maybe silence the child for good, and the father be childless, forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, 2 year olds do not make things up.<br />
At that age they are pretty much like the proverbial<br />
parrot, in that they repeat virtually everything said to them (or in this case, done to them).</p>
<p>I find it impossible to believe that a 2 yr old well adjusted and brought up child would say anything like this if there was not a single grain of truth to it.</p>
<p>I believe 100% that the father was justified and the neighbour was Guilty.</p>
<p>And as Child molesters are incurable, then the death of this one was the best thing that could have happened.</p>
<p>Better that the father be in prison and and the child alive, than the molester get a second chance and maybe silence the child for good, and the father be childless, forever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
