Bad Boyfriend Takes Nudie Pics of Teen; Mom Profits

ClickOnDetroit.com

Toledo Blade

Monroe News

This charming fellow is James Frazee, of Monroe, Michigan.  He’s accused of taking more than 500,000 explicit pictures of his girlfriend’s daughter over seven years, beginning when she was just eight years old. That works out to around 196 pictures per day. Mom Patricia Podgajski helped Frazee set up a website, so people perverts all over the world could watch her daughter being abused. They shared the profits ($1000+ per month.) I wonder if either of them had real jobs?

Federal investigators discovered the abuse when images of the victim were found on a Tennessee pedo’s computer. They traced the content back to mom and boyfriend of the year over there. This isn’t Frazee’s first run in with the law, either. In 1990, he was convicted of raping his own biological daughter, who was under 13 at the time. Podgajski admitted to investigators that she knew all about it- and she still allowed him to live with her and her two children! I’m have to admit I’m  a little weirded out that their living arrangements didn’t come into question before now. As of this morning, he’s listed as “compliant” on the Michigan Sex Offender Registry.

Category: Abuse
  • http://bit.ly/9WTmpg Ronnie Scouten

    Summary of news of Tiger Woods

  • http://bit.ly/9WTmpg Ronnie Scouten

    Summary of news of Tiger Woods

  • pak31

    Reading this story have me the shivers. It’s just so hard to wrap my brain around these stories sometimes. One positive thing about this site, it makes me thank God everyday that I had a wonderful and normal, loving childhood and my adult life has continued that way as well, I am seriously grateful. This mother sickens me, her natural lack to protect her child from harm in order to profit financially??? She doesn’t deserve this daughter. I pray the girl survives this ordeal but given the length of time she suffered the abuse I don’t know.

  • pak31

    Reading this story have me the shivers. It’s just so hard to wrap my brain around these stories sometimes. One positive thing about this site, it makes me thank God everyday that I had a wonderful and normal, loving childhood and my adult life has continued that way as well, I am seriously grateful. This mother sickens me, her natural lack to protect her child from harm in order to profit financially??? She doesn’t deserve this daughter. I pray the girl survives this ordeal but given the length of time she suffered the abuse I don’t know.

  • Amanda

    How do these sick people find each other? Where is the girl’s biological father in all of this? As a parent, I cant imagine letting someone abuse my children..ever! There is nothing more important to me than they are. This woman should be sterilized. She should never be allowed to have another child because she doesn’t deserve to be a mother. I am very sad that the little girl felt that she didn’t have someone she could trust to talk to. She must have been brainwashed and very scared. I hope that she gets the help she needs to put this all behind her.
    As for him, I hope he rots in a jail cell.death is too easy, he deserves to suffer for the rest of his life.

  • Amanda

    How do these sick people find each other? Where is the girl’s biological father in all of this? As a parent, I cant imagine letting someone abuse my children..ever! There is nothing more important to me than they are. This woman should be sterilized. She should never be allowed to have another child because she doesn’t deserve to be a mother. I am very sad that the little girl felt that she didn’t have someone she could trust to talk to. She must have been brainwashed and very scared. I hope that she gets the help she needs to put this all behind her.
    As for him, I hope he rots in a jail cell.death is too easy, he deserves to suffer for the rest of his life.

  • http://yahoo leann

    I am telling you,, all them mf’s should be hung to daeth :evil:

    • Deena

      AGREED! 100000000000000000000000%

  • leann

    I am telling you,, all them mf’s should be hung to daeth :evil:

    • Deena

      AGREED! 100000000000000000000000%

  • Deena

    I sent a link to this story and I have been following it. It disgusts me so much! This poor girl, she is going to be scarred….

  • Deena

    I sent a link to this story and I have been following it. It disgusts me so much! This poor girl, she is going to be scarred….

  • Angie

    Not surprising. Some of the caseworkers here (MI) are as bad as some “parents” they “investigate,” finding it much easier to let cases that might require some WORK (and, you know, actually PROTECTING the kids they’re charged with protecting) go by the wayside and go after parents who haven’t done shit wrong. After all, the ones who really ARE scum-sucking piles of walking, talking feces are just poor souls in need of help – and mentally ill, so they can’t help themselves – the proof of that backed up by the mountains of evidence against them, so let’s give them MORE help… while parents who really ARE parenting have no such leverage. You can’t prove a negative, so it’s easy to snatch their kids away from them and auction them off on the state-sanctioned and -funded baby market. Besides, the state only wants to sell the kids coming from the parents who didn’t really do anything wrong: The ones whose parents beat, starved, neglected, abused, molested, raped, [insert act of gross stupidity and/or malice here] are damaged goods while the ones who had nothing done to them are not.

    They’re a hot commodity in Michigan, too, especially with our state govt’s financial position (i.e., swirling the bowl), and the federal money the counties get under ASFA.

    • jj

      Please don’t take this the wrong way, but you really have some issues.

      • Angie

        Perhaps so, but I’ve seen it with my own eyes, in one case where I was subpoenaed to testify by the attorney who wrote this:

        http://www.parentsforchildren.net/janetfrederickwilson/fiagame0.cfm

        and another case not too dissimilar from the one in this post, the social worker bending over backwards to make sure the mother kept custody even after sexual abuse by the mother’s significant other was disclosed by her two daughters.

        • jj

          I understand that, I would never want to be put in the position you were in, and I believe that the child welfare system in the entire country needs an overhaul, but to paint the entire system with the same brush is unfair to those who really do care and go above and beyond to make sure these children are safe.

          But this statement was the one that bothered me the most, “After all, the ones who really ARE scum-sucking piles of walking, talking feces are just poor souls in need of help – and mentally ill, so they can’t help themselves “. You’re excusing these people’s behavior, intentional or not. There is help for people who want it, but if you have to CHOOSE to take that help and change your life. From my own personal experiences, more often than not, that help is not wanted or welcomed.

          So, exclusively blaming the “system” is unfair to many, including the children who’s “parents” made the decision to go at it alone, instead of getting the help that they need.

          • http://myspace.com/rorhi Jenn from NM

            I read the comment about the mental health of the bad parents as sarcastic, but that could just be me…

          • jj

            I did too, at first, but if you read the entire post, and notice the word “are” in all caps, it changes the tone of the comment.

        • jj

          I checked out the link you posted, and she’s a family law lawyer who represents parents who are accused of crimes against their children, correct? I think that that article needs to be taken with a grain of salt, considering her profession and the reasons for her opinions. I’m not saying that what she wrote is 100% untrue, what I am saying is I think there’s more to it than what she wrote. It’s her perspective of laws which SHE thinks are ridiculous and unfair.

        • jj

          Here are links to the actual law that is referenced in the article:

          http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(f4z33rjcwxpsbq454gpobp55))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-act-238-of-1975&userid=

        • jj

          And to the Michigan DHS website:

          http://www.michigan.gov/dhs/0,1607,7-124-5452_7119-21208–,00.html

          I think your lawyer friend’s a “typical defense attorney” and I think you had some type of interaction with DHS and are bitter as hell about it.

          • Angie

            It was actually meant as sarcasm. I should have put it in quotes, as “poor souls” and “mentally ill” like I did “parents.” My fault, sorry.

            That lawyer isn’t my friend, only met her the day I went to court to testify, so odds are, she probably is one of those “typical defense attorneys.” When I happened across that article some years ago, I actually did take it with a grain of salt – until I saw a blatant (and later admitted) abuse of power by a CPS worker with my own eyes. It was kind of surreal. I am quite familiar with the laws in MI, particularly TPR and best interests, having had to print sections out once for a social worker who claimed ignorance as to content, along with a page from the DHS procedure manual.

            And while I certainly was painting with broad strokes, I DID say *some* social workers, not all of them. I have, in fact, met a few who went above and beyond. As for being bitter, I agree that I am. The interaction is the case I mentioned not too dissimilar from the one in the post, a nightmare for two little girls that continues to this day, the “mother’s” behavior and deeds written off as “mental illness, she can’t help herself.” Meanwhile, these girls are forced into a situation where the behaviors not only continue but are accelerating and still no action is taken to actually protect them, and a court employee said to my face that “children have no rights until they turn 18″ (when the girls said they did not want to go to the mother’s home and why, CPS continuing to look the other way on what the girls continued to report to them). That kinda clinched it for me, I guess.

            I am by no means excusing their behavior. I abhor it, disgusted that they abuse “mental illness” to try to get out of taking responsibility for their actions, disgusted that elements of the system allow them to do it, and downright pissed off that doing so makes a mockery of TRUE mental illness and those who suffer from it.

            Regardless, I would bet a donut that in the end, the cow in this post who felt that her need to have her penis present was more important than the safety of her child will claim “mental illness.” And some social worker will bend over backwards to make sure family reunification is at the top of the agenda.

          • jj

            Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. The way that I interpreted your comment confused me, espicially since your other posts came off (to me) way different and this one seemed…. I’m not quite sure how to describe it.

          • Angie

            ;-) I get that way sometimes, a little weird around the edges. Stress, I think. Looking back at my first comment, I can see how it probably looked a little funky (compared to some of my past comments, anyhow).

            *snort* at least I know you’re paying attention to me, right, jj? :lol:

  • Angie

    Not surprising. Some of the caseworkers here (MI) are as bad as some “parents” they “investigate,” finding it much easier to let cases that might require some WORK (and, you know, actually PROTECTING the kids they’re charged with protecting) go by the wayside and go after parents who haven’t done shit wrong. After all, the ones who really ARE scum-sucking piles of walking, talking feces are just poor souls in need of help – and mentally ill, so they can’t help themselves – the proof of that backed up by the mountains of evidence against them, so let’s give them MORE help… while parents who really ARE parenting have no such leverage. You can’t prove a negative, so it’s easy to snatch their kids away from them and auction them off on the state-sanctioned and -funded baby market. Besides, the state only wants to sell the kids coming from the parents who didn’t really do anything wrong: The ones whose parents beat, starved, neglected, abused, molested, raped, [insert act of gross stupidity and/or malice here] are damaged goods while the ones who had nothing done to them are not.

    They’re a hot commodity in Michigan, too, especially with our state govt’s financial position (i.e., swirling the bowl), and the federal money the counties get under ASFA.

    • jj

      Please don’t take this the wrong way, but you really have some issues.

      • Angie

        Perhaps so, but I’ve seen it with my own eyes, in one case where I was subpoenaed to testify by the attorney who wrote this:

        http://www.parentsforchildren.net/janetfrederickwilson/fiagame0.cfm

        and another case not too dissimilar from the one in this post, the social worker bending over backwards to make sure the mother kept custody even after sexual abuse by the mother’s significant other was disclosed by her two daughters.

        • jj

          I understand that, I would never want to be put in the position you were in, and I believe that the child welfare system in the entire country needs an overhaul, but to paint the entire system with the same brush is unfair to those who really do care and go above and beyond to make sure these children are safe.

          But this statement was the one that bothered me the most, “After all, the ones who really ARE scum-sucking piles of walking, talking feces are just poor souls in need of help – and mentally ill, so they can’t help themselves “. You’re excusing these people’s behavior, intentional or not. There is help for people who want it, but if you have to CHOOSE to take that help and change your life. From my own personal experiences, more often than not, that help is not wanted or welcomed.

          So, exclusively blaming the “system” is unfair to many, including the children who’s “parents” made the decision to go at it alone, instead of getting the help that they need.

          • http://myspace.com/rorhi Jenn from NM

            I read the comment about the mental health of the bad parents as sarcastic, but that could just be me…

          • jj

            I did too, at first, but if you read the entire post, and notice the word “are” in all caps, it changes the tone of the comment.

        • jj

          I checked out the link you posted, and she’s a family law lawyer who represents parents who are accused of crimes against their children, correct? I think that that article needs to be taken with a grain of salt, considering her profession and the reasons for her opinions. I’m not saying that what she wrote is 100% untrue, what I am saying is I think there’s more to it than what she wrote. It’s her perspective of laws which SHE thinks are ridiculous and unfair.

        • jj

          Here are links to the actual law that is referenced in the article:

          http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(f4z33rjcwxpsbq454gpobp55))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-act-238-of-1975&userid=

        • jj

          And to the Michigan DHS website:

          http://www.michigan.gov/dhs/0,1607,7-124-5452_7119-21208–,00.html

          I think your lawyer friend’s a “typical defense attorney” and I think you had some type of interaction with DHS and are bitter as hell about it.

          • Angie

            It was actually meant as sarcasm. I should have put it in quotes, as “poor souls” and “mentally ill” like I did “parents.” My fault, sorry.

            That lawyer isn’t my friend, only met her the day I went to court to testify, so odds are, she probably is one of those “typical defense attorneys.” When I happened across that article some years ago, I actually did take it with a grain of salt – until I saw a blatant (and later admitted) abuse of power by a CPS worker with my own eyes. It was kind of surreal. I am quite familiar with the laws in MI, particularly TPR and best interests, having had to print sections out once for a social worker who claimed ignorance as to content, along with a page from the DHS procedure manual.

            And while I certainly was painting with broad strokes, I DID say *some* social workers, not all of them. I have, in fact, met a few who went above and beyond. As for being bitter, I agree that I am. The interaction is the case I mentioned not too dissimilar from the one in the post, a nightmare for two little girls that continues to this day, the “mother’s” behavior and deeds written off as “mental illness, she can’t help herself.” Meanwhile, these girls are forced into a situation where the behaviors not only continue but are accelerating and still no action is taken to actually protect them, and a court employee said to my face that “children have no rights until they turn 18″ (when the girls said they did not want to go to the mother’s home and why, CPS continuing to look the other way on what the girls continued to report to them). That kinda clinched it for me, I guess.

            I am by no means excusing their behavior. I abhor it, disgusted that they abuse “mental illness” to try to get out of taking responsibility for their actions, disgusted that elements of the system allow them to do it, and downright pissed off that doing so makes a mockery of TRUE mental illness and those who suffer from it.

            Regardless, I would bet a donut that in the end, the cow in this post who felt that her need to have her penis present was more important than the safety of her child will claim “mental illness.” And some social worker will bend over backwards to make sure family reunification is at the top of the agenda.

          • jj

            Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. The way that I interpreted your comment confused me, espicially since your other posts came off (to me) way different and this one seemed…. I’m not quite sure how to describe it.

          • Angie

            ;-) I get that way sometimes, a little weird around the edges. Stress, I think. Looking back at my first comment, I can see how it probably looked a little funky (compared to some of my past comments, anyhow).

            *snort* at least I know you’re paying attention to me, right, jj? :lol:

  • http://www.myspace.com/aprilamber April

    Wow. What a mother.

    “Here you go, you fat fuck. Take nasty pics of my daughter then come give mama some sugah.”

    I hope he fucking gets shanked in the shower. I’d send a pack of smoked to the inmate that does it as a prize.

    • http://pagansagainstchildabuse.ning.com/ DodiaFae

      Maybe a few of us could go in on a carton.

  • http://www.myspace.com/aprilamber April

    Wow. What a mother.

    “Here you go, you fat fuck. Take nasty pics of my daughter then come give mama some sugah.”

    I hope he fucking gets shanked in the shower. I’d send a pack of smoked to the inmate that does it as a prize.

    • http://pagansagainstchildabuse.ning.com/ DodiaFae

      Maybe a few of us could go in on a carton.

  • Kathy

    Do society a favor and shoot them both. Neither the birth mother or the boyfriend serve any useful purpose on this earth. I’m sure they weren’t paying taxes on their ill-gotten profits, so they aren’t even helping to fund the social services the daughter is going to need. I see no bevefit to their continued existence.

  • Kathy

    Do society a favor and shoot them both. Neither the birth mother or the boyfriend serve any useful purpose on this earth. I’m sure they weren’t paying taxes on their ill-gotten profits, so they aren’t even helping to fund the social services the daughter is going to need. I see no bevefit to their continued existence.