An Accidental Kiss…..
A man(imal) has been convicted of sexual assault on a 5-year old girl. The girl’s birth vessel is defending the creature. I think I need to puke.
Ontario Court Justice Catherine Kehoe has rejected the versions given by both the mother and the step-penis about the events, because their stories had more changes than a set of newborn triplets, and were inconsistent with each other. The judge said that she believed the mother had ‘concocted’ the story to try and defend her sex-toy.
The child’s story, however, was consistent and unwavering. The little girl (now 6 years old) said that her mother’s bed-mate would come into her room every morning, and have her perform oral sex on him. She said he gave her a choice, and that she didn’t have to, but every day he would come in and offer, and she would comply. I’m sorry…I call BS. A five year old does not have a ‘choice’ in such matters. The fact of his even SUGGESTING such a heinous activity negated any ‘choice’ she might have had. Because most 5-year olds don’t feel they have the right to say no.
The mother’s story? She said the girl was confused. She said her daughter had ‘accidentally kissed’ the man’s penis one day when he was exiting the shower. Riiiiiight……. First of all, what was the little girl doing in the bathroom while the man was showering (or getting out of it)? Second, why was she in such close proximity to a naked adult male? Third, and most importantly – how in the blue depths of HELL did his dick end up anywhere NEAR her mouth – accidentally or otherwise? And there is a difference between a kiss and oral sex, anyway. The judge didn’t buy that story either. As far as I can see, accidentally having your genitals end up in a child’s mouth is almost as likely as ‘accidentally’ having sex with your secretary. Meaning not at all likely.
The betrayal doesn’t stop at the mother’s defense of the penis, though. She also stated that she intended to live with the penis at the conclusion of the court case. The man’s father had bought them a house, and they were all going to live there – including the victim. I wish the incubator actually WAS going to be living with him after the court case – that would mean that she would be in jail too…..right where she belongs.
And can somebody tell me WHY the freakin’ enabling twat still has custody of her daughter, anyway? She let this happen to her kid, then she defended the pedophile, and now she has voiced her intentions to live with the guy again. So WHY is the little girl still with her? Can anyone from Canada explain this one to me? Am I missing something here? I need to go puke again….
Thanks to Bishop Black for this tip.
