The title isn’t a riddle. It’s an actual question.
Lisa Knight had every reason to keep her 6-year-old daughter from her ex-husband, 55-year-old Nicholas Elizondo. Elizondo was convicted of raping his 6-year-old step daughter 6 years ago. In that time, Lisa Knight moved from California to Oklahoma and raised their daughter without any help from the sick fuck. There’s nothing wrong with a mother protecting her baby girl, right? Wrong.
After 6 years of being in prison, Elizondo petitioned for sole custody of little Sarah after Knight stopped allowing him visitation. The reason Knight ceased the visitation; On one trip to California to see her “father”, Sarah claimed that her half brother (19) touched her inappropriately. Sadly, it was speculated that Knight made up this story to get back at her ex. Even if she did, I still find her to be a better parent than a man who has proven he is a sick fuck. Even worse, it seems that Sarah is in danger times two, being as her father and half brother are both sick fucks and she no longer has her mother to protect her.
After minutes of deliberation, the judge decided that Elizondo seemed more suitable as a parent. …the fuck? Knight’s parenting came into question when she didn’t have all of Sarah’s medical info handy. Sarah was born with a cleft pallet and had several specialists. I suppose her mother was supposed to have had all of that info committed to memory. I can’t remember the name and number of my ONE child’s doctor most days.
Here’s to hoping the piece of shit judge comes to his senses and / or Elizondo accidentally falls into a wood chipper.
Thanks go to Dodia Fae from PACA for sharing this tip with us.